23.1.2008 15:30:05 Kimmy, 2 deti
Re: to není sebeobětování
Rachel - jaky jasny odkaz do odborne literatury mas na mysli? Prof. Matejcka? On zkoumal castecne uvazku a pobyt dvouletych deti v jeslich po dobu ctyr nebo peti hodin denne?
Neodmitam se dovzdelavat - naopak - uz jsem nasla nejakou odbornou literaturu, jen jsem cekala, jestli se neozve Stana, protoze s tou jsem o tech odbornicich debatila - ale nemohu detskou vyvojovou psychologii opravdu "studovat" - jsem matka dvou deti a mam praci na plny uvazek, kterou delam po vecerech - a tato diskuse zacala vcera - kdy jsem se mela dovzdelat?
Takze zde nekolik odbornych clanku
"A study conducted by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that when mothers
work full time during their child’s pre-school years the child is less effective at A-level work (Cavel, 2001). Children of full time working mothers achieved at A-level 52 % of the time (Cavel, 2001). These children also found themselves unemployed 9% more of the time as well as suffering from psychological stress 28% more of the time compared to that of children with nonworking mothers (Cavel, 2001)." - deti matek pracujicich na plny uvazek behem predskolnich let maji horsi vysledky u maturity a taktez o 9% vice jich bylo nezamestnanych a o 28% vice jich trpelo psychologickym stresem.
Toto je ovsem PLNY UVAZEK v predskolnich letech - tedy to, co je zcela bezna praxe v CR.
Zde jina studie
"Current research also looks at positive outcomes of working mothers. Some
studies show that while the lack of a mother’s presence can impact a child negatively, this impact is not as severe as what occurs if the mother does not work. Such factors include poverty, parental education, and quality childcare (Booth, 2000). In some cases without the income of the mother, the family may find themselves living at poverty level. With a dual income household, many women find themselves more able to make more choices for their families when it comes to nutrition and education (Essortment, 2002). According to a study in 1998, the improvement in living standards by working mothers offset any negatives (Carvel, 2001)." - soucasny vyzkum vidi i pozitivni dusledky pracujicich matek. Nektere studie ukazuju, ze zatimco nedostatecujici pobyt s matkou muze dite negativne ovlivni, dusledky nejsou tak zavazne, jako v pripade, ze matka nepracuje. To zahrnuje faktory jako chudoba, vzdelani rodicu a kvalitni zarizeni pece o deti. V nekterch pripadech bez prijmu matky rodina zila na urovni chudoby. Zeny zijici v domacnosti se dvema prijmy jsou matky casto schopny cinit lepsi volbu tykajici se zdrave vyzivy a vzdelani. Podle studie z roku 1998 zlepseni zivotni urovne diky prijmu matek vyrovnava jakekoli negativni dopady.
"It has been shown that children of a nonworking parent “fail to see the point of getting an education” (Figes, 2001)" - bylo prokazano, ze deti, ktere maji jednoho z rodicu nepracujiciho vubec nevidi duvod, proc se vzdelavat.
"Positive results were also found with children who had to go to childcare. When
the child was placed in a quality childcare situation there were positive effects on the child’s social and cognitive development (Figes, 2001)" - Pozitivni vysledky byly take zjisteny u deti, ktere musely do vychovneho zarizeni - pokud bylo dite v kvalitnim zarizeni, existoval pozitivni vliv na socialni a poznavaci schopnosti.
Omlouvam se za kostrbaty preklad, je to hrozne narychlo.
Bohuzel nemuzu najit konkretni pripad vyzkumu vlivu castecnych uvazku na dvoulete deti...
Ale snad to staci jako ukazka, ze se vyzkumu nevyhybam a ze jsem ochotna si informace vyhledat.
Kimmy
Odpovědět